Definition
In philosophy of science, the Duhem–Quine thesis, also called the Duhem–Quine problem, says that unambiguous falsifications of a scientific hypothesis are impossible, because an empirical test of the hypothesis requires one or more background assumptions. Rather than disproving the main hypothesis, the blame can be placed on one of the background beliefs or "auxiliary" hypotheses. It is named after French theoretical physicist Pierre Duhem and American logician Willard Van Orman Quine, who wrote about similar concepts.
Related concepts
A priori and a posterioriAllan FranklinArtifact (error)Cesare Cremonini (philosopher)Classical logicClassical mechanicsConfirmation holismDeviant logicEarthEmpirical evidenceEmpirical methodEpistemologicalExtraordinary claims require extraordinary evidenceFalsifiabilityGalileo GalileiGalileo affairGeometrical opticsKnowledgeMany-valued logicModus ponensMoons of JupiterMythPhilosophy of sciencePierre DuhemQuantum logicRelativistic mechanicsScience & EducationScientific hypothesisSemantics of logicSicSpringer Science+Business MediaTelescopeTheory-ladennessTruth valueTwo Dogmas of EmpiricismUnderdeterminationWillard Van Orman Quine
3 concepts already in your glossary